Han Chunyu is undoubtedly one of the most popular Chinese researchers in 2016. From the blockbuster published in the journal Nature-Biotechnology magazine to the denunciation of academic fraud, the paradox he experienced was as ups and downs as a roller coaster. Recently, Nature-Biotechnology published the latest statement on the paper "DNA-guided genome editing using NgAgo". The statement states that the journal has obtained new data related to the repeatability of the NgAgo system and needs to investigate the data before deciding whether to take further action. Questioning whether it can advance science? Public opinion is back in the air, but the voice is no longer single. Excuses to step down? Netizens directly poked Han Chunyu to cover me @æ²™æ¼ å°ç‹: This is just another delay in Han Chunyu's time. The domestic and foreign industry insiders have just started to invest quickly. After a few weeks, everyone can't repeat the large-scale questioning, plus Han Chunyu's cover, and interviews. The degree of amateurity in the talks and photos is really shocking. @茹é²å…”: A fake paper, mixed with a job title, won two or three hundred million to build a gene center, a lot of people are happy, finally find a false positive, contaminated and a decent excuse to step down. Science must stand up to doubt but not by force @å¹´å°å°åæ°”: An academic paper that shocked the world is available, which will inevitably cause all the laboratories in the world to do the same thing to pay attention to and reappear. When a large amount of human and material resources cannot be reproduced, it is understandable to ask the original author to provide experimental data as evidence. Han Chunyu could not give clear evidence, at least the method he proposed, not every success. Nowadays, there is reproducible data. At most, it is proved that Han Chunyu has no fraud, and it cannot be said that the original question was wrong. @我也蛮人: Science must stand up to question, but the question is not to press people, but not to look down on people with high honor. This is the mistake of thinking inertia. Professor Chen: Science needs to question the spirit, but excessive onlookers and public opinion are not conducive to the development of cutting-edge science. For the frontier scientific research field that is not yet known, do not use the discussion in the research field as the basis for judgment. @严磊9: Science itself has developed in constant twists and turns. If we uphold the normal scientific research attitude and question the facts, it will help academic research. Li Tingpai: Han Chunyu has no motives Tetanus Toxoid Vaccine,Toxoid Vaccine,Hep B Immune Globulin,Immunoglobulin Injections FOSHAN PHARMA CO., LTD. , https://www.fs-pharma.com
